![]() 01/06/2020 at 14:46 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
A) Half Full
B) H alf E mpty
C) Inefficient Use of Glass.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 14:51 |
|
As long as it’s not in a vacuum, the glass is full - half liquid , half air.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 14:55 |
|
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:08 |
|
It’s completely full of liquid, half compressible and half non-compressible.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:09 |
|
if it were in a vacuum wouldn’t the water boil away making an empty glass ?
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:14 |
|
Someone paid attention in chemistry class.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:16 |
|
Good catch. The last chemistry class I had was at least 36 years ago. I’ve forgotten a little since then...
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:17 |
|
Using a 2:1 engineering safety factor that is a 100% utilized glass.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:17 |
|
Since I recently watched season 1 of Westworld, I have to go with:
D) It means the glass has been engineered to the wrong specifications
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:23 |
|
Mmm - free glass!
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:37 |
|
From a speed perspective, the container is perfect. Not too heavy, and not too full that you need to be careful when taking a drink.
You can pick it up quickly and take a good swig.
It’s filled enough for qualifying.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 15:37 |
|
No replacement for displacement.
However a good case could be made for, “Simplify and add lightness”. The glass should be designed with purpose and intent. Thus having the size of the glass already optimized is the cheapest option, and the simplest solution when taking into account both making and filling the cup.
![]() 01/06/2020 at 17:11 |
|